Question #1) In issue #3 of Double Room,
Ron Silliman suggests that it is erroneous to assume “that a signature feature
of the prose poem is its brevity.” He calls this misguided
assumption, Jacob’s fallacy, and he further argues that
considering the differences between the prose poem and the flash
fiction
is “like trying to identify the border between, say, Korean & Portuguese,
similar insofar as each is a language.” Do you agree with
Silliman’s assessment? In contrast, Ava Chin suggests that
she wrote flash fiction during a period when she was extremely
overworked: “their jarring method and brevity, their element
of surprise, lent themselves well to my shortened yet heightened
attention span.” Chin seems to suggest that the brevity
aided and enabled a new kind of invention for her. Do you think
that prose poetry and flash fiction do have some kind of compression
or brevity as a related characteristic? When you write in this
form, the pp/ff, do you place any space or length restrictions
on yourself?
One shouldn't assume that a prose poem has
to be brief, just as one doesn't assume that a "regular" poem
must end within haiku limitations or be confined to a paragraph
or a page. Although
I think of prose poetry as a compressed form, relish traveling
a long distance within a small space, love the intensity and
distillation of its language and ideas, prose poetry should be
allowed that potential for expansion. No one arches an eyebrow
at the possibility of a book-length poem--okay, maybe a few people
do--so why place length restrictions on a prose poem? I don't
want to burden myself with artificial limitations, so who's to
say I won't write a 100 page prose poem someday? (Imagine sustaining
that focus...) An impertinent piece might just demand a fifty
room estate because it can't let go of any priceless belongings.
On the other hand, to me, the word "flash" in
flash fiction does indicate some form of brevity. The terms micro-fiction,
short short, sudden fiction, and quick fiction all sound like terms
for brief forms. Where the cut-off points lie between flash fiction
and short fiction, short fiction and fiction, I don't know...and
don't particularly care. I believe that writers should work without
arbitrary rules; that they should let their work reach whatever
finish line appears when the piece is done. They should focus on
the nature of what fills the container, not the shape or size of
the goblet or glass slipper. In other words, does the writing sparkle
on the tongue? (Is it fizzy like champagne, or fizzy like spoiled
peaches?)
When I write, I never plan what form each piece will take at the
outset. I usually start out with a particular image/detail or line,
and then let the work reveal itself from there. I put no space,
length or category limits on it. If I were to cram a growing work
into a tiny cage, tamp it into a space the size of a velvet-lined
ring box, would that make it more precious, or just more compact?
Spare and elegant...or crippled? Word counts risk distorting natural
language into a bound foot or a redwood bonsai. (Wait...that's
intriguing...this is starting to sound like a vote for brevity....)
Curious, I just did a word count of my prose poems and flash fiction
pieces. The average was 258 words per work. The shortest was only
75 words, the longest was 639. Pretty much, all by themselves,
they stayed to one page or less, single-spaced.
As one experiments with "new" combinations
of genres, hybrids of hybrids, not just various perches on the
spectrum between
prose poetry and flash fiction, the size issue becomes more muddled.
Lately, I've been writing works that mix elements of prose poetry,
creative nonfiction, lyric essay, flash fiction, and memoir. My
thought? Keep it open-ended, don't be afraid to shuffle, see what
evolves.
This attitude pushes me to leap to the last part of the last question,
#7: "Does this form enable (perhaps
require) you to make a political statement about form and genre?"
As in, do I feel compelled to embroider "Don't Tread on Me" on
my flag? As in, do I see myself in the role of liberated writer,
a folk artist shaping my beautiful bottle cap and mud sculptures,
eyes spinning like happy pinwheels, turning my back on conventional
ideas and rules? Maybe. When I first sent out prose poetry / flash
fiction in hope of publication, some of the responses I received
made me both laugh and sigh. "These pieces seem caught between
poetry and fiction." Oh...really? "I don't really care
for this form." Sound of a door clicking shut. (This from
an editor whose own work later appeared in an anthology of flash
fiction.) So, do I feel like a rebel? Do I feel like I'm slapping
the face of the literary establishment, penning pieces like angry
letters to narrow-minded arbiters of taste? Hmmm. Not really, especially
since both prose poems and flash fiction have grown more acceptable,
less outsider genres. I feel more like I'm passionate about what
I'm doing, whatever it is, and want to share it. I feel like I
fell in love with hybrid genres, that these more open, malleable
forms grant me freedom, permission to wick the unconscious, to
write wilder, more organic works. (That might be just my own perception.)
For me, all writing should be something pure and true--individual--and
shouldn't be molded to fit the expectations and limits of others.
Now, please jump back with me to question #5, which includes this
statement by Jamey Dunham: "I write prose poems because
I believe the form of prose instinctively lends itself to the techniques
that most interest me in poetry." I'll answer this
sub-question: "What
poetic techniques do you find most interesting and instinctive
in the prose poem?"
Ahhh...my favorite, my passion: metaphor--in
particular, metaphor sustained throughout the prose poem, binding
it with vivid clarity
and unexpected connections. Imagery...again, as an artist, creating
that visual emphasis with words is intuitive and thrilling. I love
the density of images working together, odd juxtapositions giving
off sparks. Another technique: use of "deep images," ones
that pop to the surface, carrying the scent of other levels of
meaning, a sense of a more expansive picture, a path of bobbing
steppingstones to lead the reader farther into the piece. Prose
poetry welcomes the captured lyric moment, personification, occasional
hyperbole. As in poetry, I also use rhythm and sound to carry the
piece forward, to give it human emotion and breath, musicality.
I use assonance, dissonance, hidden rhyme, syncopation, whatever
elements enhance the piece, fit naturally, match emotionally. Since
I feel more like a poet than a fiction writer, I tend to write
significantly more prose poems than flash fiction pieces.
Bio:
Christine Boyka Kluge's first book of poetry, Teaching
Bones to Fly, was published by Bitter Oleander Press in
December 2003. Her chapbook, Domestic Weather, winner
of the 2003 Uccelli Press Chapbook Contest, will be published
this June. Her writing has received
several Pushcart Prize nominations, and was given the 1999 Frances
Locke Memorial Poetry Award. In 2003, her work was anthologized
in No Boundaries: Prose Poems by 24 American Poets (Tupelo
Press);
(Some from) Diagram (Del Sol Press); and Sudden
Stories: A Mammoth Anthology of Miniscule Fiction (Mammoth
Books). Her writing also appears in The Bitter Oleander, Hotel
Amerika, Luna, Natural
Bridge,
Quarter After Eight, Quarterly West, Sentence,
and other publications.
|