The self in poetry has gotten a bad rap.
Getting away from all those excruciatingly dull “I” poems whose only claim for our
attention is “It really happened that way!” created a trend in poetry away from I
and towards—what? Sometimes, “you” sometimes, “they or he or we or it” but
mostly towards an oddly disembodied “I” in the poem, one that, at times,
seemed insane and boring at the same time:1
Hello I’m Jack Jerk
Clark Coolidge, from Traced Red Dot
or towards no “I” at all, or even subject matter. Just a quick patter of
elf-slippered feet over grass, a puff of worn-out words, a will o’ the wisp and
a tip o’ the cap to a lass named Jorie:
Apex
of light,
confusion of greens
Delightful
shadows of windless
  heat
moving over
  the waters.
Diane Di Prima, from Midsummer
Or, worse, the I-punish-you poem, sometimes called a prose poem,
wherein we are forced into a chair, tied up and made to listen to someone
droning without any relief from the language, as if to say, you want an “I”?
I’ll give you an “I”! and you’ll get no metaphors, music or interesting images
until you admit this is a poem.
Winnie, I am writing this on behalf of my friend Harris. He loves you
Sarah Manguso, from Address to Winnie in Paris
Without the I there is no point of view, only words and their disparate scatter
across a page. Without the I there is no story, only a private, free-associative
frame into which we may or may not be invited by the poet. But most importantly,
without the I there
is no “eye”, no see-er behind the scenes, no directing intelligence or shaper of the poem.
At Perihelion we like to be in the presence of a poem, to meet its eye—not that of
the poet, but that of the poet’s created self, and the language that self uses to
engage us.
In this issue, you’ll find no boring journal-entries, fractured robot-language,
or pretty words scattered like so many petals on a page. Instead, you’ll find the
unafraid, joyful, creation of an “I” -- and an eye. Take a look.
1 All examples are from The Best American Poetry, 2002.
|