"...the more I write and teach, the more I realize everyone comes to things in different ways at different times..."
BobSward's Writer's Friendship Series A quick list to poets featured in this issue:
|
Featured Poet: Quan Barry
Quan Barry was born in Saigon and rasied on Boston's north shore. she
received her MFA from the University of Michigan and was a Wallace
Stegner
fellow at Stanford University as well as the Diane Middlebrook poetry
fellow at the University of Wisconsin's Institute for Creative Writing.
Quan Barry's work has appeared in such journals as The Kenyon Review,
The
Missouri Review, and The New Yorker. Currently she is assistant
professor of English at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Following is a conversation Perhelion's Beth Woodcome had with Quan Barry about her poetic development.
Can you share a bit of your journey so far? Where did it start and
where
are you now?
As a child I dabbled here and there a bit writing and illustarting
stories
(mostly stuff about a dog possibly named Hermann Biff (tho' if I really
pressed myself to remember, I think I'd recall his name was probably
(unimaginatively) Spot)), but I didn't start writing poetry until my
first
year at the University of Virginia. There were two girls in my suite (a
New
Yorker and a hippie chick from Mobile, Alabama) who kept journals, and I
would
come home from class and see them out on the on the balcony writing away
(and also possibly drinking vodka in broad daylight! (very Anne
Sexton-like)). Anyway, after a while, I began to notice other people in
the
dorm who also wrote poetry--some shaggy-haired guy from Connecticut, a
farm
boy mathmetician, some aerobics girl from Long island etc.--and for some
reason, I thought that just seemed really inordinately cool, the idea of
writing just for yourself, not for a grade etc. In our suite, we started
holding informal poetry readings in the bathroom (there were no windows
there, so we'd turn out the lights, light some candles, and have instant
ambience); to make a long story short, I guess I got hooked. Virginia
has
some great poets on staff--Rita Dove and Charles Wright being the most
famous--and as undergrads we were always clamoring to get into their
classes. Although I wasn't an English major (my BA's in liberal arts), I
did take a few workshops, and after I graduated I took a year off before
heading to the University if Michigan for my MFA. Then after Michigan I
was
a Wallace Stegner Fellow at Stanford and eventually the Diane
Middlebrook
Poetry Fellow at the University of Wisconsin's Institute for Creative
Writing where eventually eventually I was lucky enough to land my
current
job as an assistant professor of English.
How would you characterize the kind of poetry you write (lyric,
dramatic
narrative, etc)?
Hmmm, although I know my own work pretty well, I have a hard time
characterizing the poems in ASYLUM. For a while while I was out at
Stanford, I used to think of them as confessional, and my friends were
always telling me, "Uh, no." I definitely recognize (especially in the
epilogue poems) just how lyrical
the work can be, but something about the subject matter in ASYLUM gives
me
pause before claiming they're simply lyric. When I say confessional,
there's absolutely nothing strictly confessional about the poems
(obviously
I never have been nor will I ever be, say, Steven Seagal), and yet I
recognize the part of me that's fascinated/motivated by violence so that
I
almost feel that I am confessing something in a poem like "The Glimmer
Man". Anyway, my second manuscript titled CONTROVERTIBLES is definitely
much more meditative in voice; while I was out at Stanford, that was my
goal, to become more meditative, yet I ended up writing most of ASYLUM
which isn't that at all. My first year here in Wisconsin I sorta
stumbled
onto a meditative voice and a form, and I ended up writing
CONTROVERTIBLES
in about a year. Currently I'm working on a book about Vietnam, but I'm
not
sure how it's going--I don't want it to be a travel log, and I'm also
trying to change my voice, do something different, so the writing's
coming
much slower than I'm used to.
Who are your major influences?
Hmmm again. I'm always telling my students you can be influenced by many
things, not just poetry. I'm really into this idea of things being just
what they are. For example, every day walking home from class in
California, I would pass this huge tree that took up an entire front
yard,
and I remember always thinking I could learn more about poetry by
studying
that tree than I could by taking literature classes (does that sound
pretentious and strange? I hope not). Anyway, as far as poets go, some
of
my first loves were W.S. Merwin and Robert Bly's LEAPING POETRY (which
introduced my to Lorca, Neruda, Vallejo), but more recently I find
myself
into Anne Carson, Jorie Graham, Louise Gluck, novelists like Martin
Amis,
Haruki Murakami, filmmakers like Terrence Malik and the Wakowski (sp?)
Brothers, TV shows like Nova etc. I guess in some ways I'm not talking
about influences as far as style goes but maybe more where a lot of my
ideas come from. Finally, I should mention I'm a Bardolator, and also
(fortunately? unfortunately?) I read the Bible for its poetry; I just
finished reading a couple of books in Richmond Lattimore's translation
of
the New Testament (I'm way into Lattimore).
Which poets do you have your eye on now?
There are some really great first books out there. I'm really into Olena
Kalyiak Davis'AND HER SOUL OUT OF NOTHING, Tessa Rumsey's ASSEMBLING
THE
SHEPHERD, Maurice Manning's LAWRENCE BOOTH'S BOOK OF VISION,lots of
books
by friends from the Stegner program, a book by a friend named Glori
Simmons
called GRAFT. I'm sorta starting to get into Carl Phillips, and I'm also
a
big fan of Lucie Brock-Broido and Li-Young Lee. I also read a lot of
short
fiction, mostly a lot of manly man fiction; have recently gotten heavily
into Barry Hannah--the stories in AIRSHIPS are linguistically stunning.
How was your experience publishing poems, publishing your first book
Asylum?
As a grad student and a fellow at Stanford, I held off submitting work
to
journals; in both places I always felt there were some people who were
more
interested in getting published than they were in polishing their
voices.
However, the more I write and teach, the more I realize everyone comes
to
things in different ways at different times, so I would never tell
someone
to hold off publishing. To answer the question, I guess I've been in the
right place at the right time for most of my writing life, and I've been
fortunate to be published as much as I have with a great press and good
journals. I will say on the journal front that I try not to believe that
a
poem is any better or worse than it is based on where it ends up. What I
mean is the poem is the poem; an okay poem of mine in THE KENYON REVIEW
is
still an okay poem while a great poem in THE MADISON REVIEW is a great
poem--just because the journal is smaller or better known etc. doesn't
add
or detract from the work.
When reading comments, reviews, and descriptions of your poetry you are
often described as a poet who is adeptly and passionately able to
convey
struggle, physical and emotional horror, dysfunction. However, in many
ways I feel consoled while reading your work. Can you tell me about
your
relationship with poetry as a healing art -- if you can identify it as
one?
I don't think of my writing as any kind of cathartic experience,
although I
can definitely see that for other writers this might well be the case in
their work. Maybe this will sound weird, but I guess I mostly started
writing because I wanted to read the kind of poems I would write.
Similarly, I don't write my poems in an attempt to work out issues in my
life but rather (and this may seem like a small distinction) to see how
said issues physically linguistically narratively etc. work out on the
page. In other words, I'm not trying to resolve anything emotionally, I
just want to see what the ideas I've got going in my head will look like
in
the medium of poetry.
You are a professor at the University of Wisconsin. Did you always
want to teach? Did it seem a natural profession to mix with the profession
of being a poet? Do you identify more with being a poet or a professor?
I definitely see myself as a poet first, prof second. I don't want to
sound
like a gunslinger, but initially I looked at teaching as a way to pay
the
bills so that I could keep writing poetry. This is going to be my third
year here as an assistant professor, and more and more I find myself
drawn
to teaching. Specifically as more and more of my students go on to think
about MFA programs, as their writing gets better and better (NB: the
kids I
started teaching back in 2000 who were sophomores etc. have just
graduated), I see the role I play in their creative lives, in helping
them
have full well-rounded undergraduate experiences, and
I realize in some ways what an honor it is to be so important to these
kids
in this way. Many of them want to live artistic lives, and I'm maybe the
first person who's not a million years older than they are who they
could
possibly see themselves becoming. All in all, it's a great life and I
know
I'm very lucky to have it.
Your poetry seems to focus on such a spectrum of subjects, from field
hockey to philosophy. How do ideas come to you? How does a poem come
to
you?
For ASYLUM, I was really in the process of finding my voice etc, so
those
poems came from wherever they came from. I listen to a lot of NPR,
mostly
FRESH AIR, and quite a few of the poems are from segments I'd heard
either
there or on ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. Because I'm the kind of person who's
really interested in making connections, in getting really into topics,
for
ASYLUM, I researched a lot of the poems (for example, the poems about
syphilis), but for my other manuscripts I haven't done any real library
research. I have to say most of the stuff I researched for the poems in
ASYLUM didn't make it into the poems but I liked having that knowledge
to
draw on if I needed it. With my second manuscript CONTROVERTIBLES I had
an
idea for the way the poems should look and read, then it was simply a
matter of coming up with the kind of subject matter that would lend
itself
to the form and voice. Again, a lot of it comes from what I was
listening
to, reading, watching etc. PBS and NPR are wellsprings for me.
You received an MFA from the University of Michigan. I know many
people
struggle with the idea of an MFA, of the benefits of getting an MFA.
How
was that experience for you -- the deciding and the actual studying and
writing?
I needed an MFA, no question about it. My writing was young and
unformed
and I didn't know much with respect to issues of craft or as far as the
contemporary landscape of poetry was concerned. I always tell my
students
that you go into an MFA to learn your craft; it's not like Harvard Law
School--you go there, it's a career move, ie. you're probably going to
be a lawyer. But you go to an MFA, there's no guarantee you'll be a poet
or a writer of some kind, so you can't go in for professional reasons.
Having said that, more and more very accomplished younger writers are going
into MFA programs not so much to study craft but because they need an MFA to
teach, to make a living. I think the academy needs to rethink its
hiring
practices in this sense; if someone has a good book should it matter
whether or not they have an MFA? I think if these accomplished
oftentimes
thirty-something writers felt that they could land jobs without an MFA,
they might not get them, which for people who don't need to learn craft
might not be a bad thing. However, that does bring up the idea of the
MFA
as a place to get writing done without real working world
considerations.
All in all, I think an MFA can be invaluable for the right kind of
student, but I do worry that for too many young writers, more and more
having an MFA is the only road to becoming a writer.
What are you working on now?
Again, I'll send my second manuscript to my press this fall and see what
happens. As far as my third book goes, I'll keep writing it and see what
happens there too. As I mentioned before, up until this point, I wrote
fairly quickly--I could write and pretty much finish a poem in a day.
Now
it takes me much longer, and while I'm not crazy about the change in my
process, I'm hoping that the work also reads much differently from other
things that I've written.
Thanks, Quan, for sharing your experience and insights with Perihelion.
Quan Barry's poetry can be found here.
|