Mel’s
Travails
And the hype shall set you
free. At least that’s
what happened for Mel Gibson once The Passion of the Christ
hit the theaters and its cinematic actuality proved to be far less
explosive than the controversial firestorm that nearly derailed
it months earlier. If you think back almost two decades, the same
thing happened to Jean-Luc Godard’s Hail Mary and
Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation of Christ (1985
and 1987 respectively): crowds stood outside theater doors protesting
the films, but once the reviews were printed and tickets sold, the
hubbub disappeared like water on a hot griddle. And now Gibson’s
getting the last laugh. Agree or disagree with his politics of the
film’s content, you have to hand it to him, he set out to
sculpt a vision without intrusion or adulteration, and to do so
assumed all the financial risk; a risqué maneuver that has
paid off, big time. While the figures are still piling up, it looks
like Gibson will pocket somewhere between two and three hundred
million dollars in a worst-case scenario. It’s independent
filmmaking at its ultimate. There’s no studio or overlord
involved and all the profits go directly to the artist. With such
unprecedented success, you can be sure that Gibson’s barnstorming
odyssey will come to serve as the alternative blueprint for the
way in which films get made in the future. Only the degree to which
that statement becomes true remains to be seen.
What caught audiences off guard (the sucker punch if you will) when
The Passion opened was the boundlessness of its violence.
Everyone was so focused on the forecasted complicity of Jews (in
the death of Jesus) and the film’s purported anti-Semitic
sentiment that no one was prepared for the graphic brutality that
would consume the screen for nearly two hours. In the end however,
no one was sparred -- Gibson spread the blame around liberally.
But that was his point: all are complicit. And, as indicated by
the savior's clairvoyant ramblings, the pinnacle event was preordained
and required the actors to play their parts (turn that over in your
mind a few times and you can almost see God sitting in his director
chair, high above). Curious though, is the portrayal of Pontius
Pilate. He gets an image upgrade of sorts, appearing contemplative,
even compassionate at times, which is a stark contrast to his historically
held legacy as a bloody tyrant. Judas also gets a human face put
on a name that has become eponymous for an avaricious backstabber.
Those less fortunate -- the Temple elders, who are bloodthirsty
witch hunters, Peter, as he forsakes Jesus (three times, the savior
prognosticates at the first occurrence) and King Harrod, the Roman
tetrarch who beheaded John the Baptist (because of his lust for
his stepdaughter, Salome, as Oscar Wilde had it) -- all come off
as one dimensional caricatures. Harrod’s the most interesting
of the lot. Here he's a fop, whose request of Jesus to perform a
miracle unfurls like a bathhouse pandering for a hand job. It’s
not the first time Gibson, who’s long been accused of being
hyper homophobic, has bent history to promote anti gay sentiment:
in Braveheart, when King Edward discovers the Prince in
bed with another man, he has the lover unceremoniously thrown out
the window. It’s a peculiar diversion too because it has nothing
to do with the film’s otherwise single-cylinder theme -- one
that Gibson pursues with ardor.
While the reviews of The Passion have ranged from zealous
adulation to vehement lambasting (most of the middle grounders like
myself, found the film cinematically stunning, but the S&M styled
torture scenes far too over-the-top), the box office totals appear
destined to break the one billion mark (Europe, DVD and pay-per-view
have yet to be tapped). Whether it achieves that or not is inconsequential,
for the Gold Rush frenzy to get more Bible stories onto the big
screen is already underway and Gibson, Hollywood’s ugly stepchild,
will be anointed to filmmaking’s top echelon of powerbrokers.
Career Killer
With Ashley Judd's latest film, Twisted, this activist
actress has again bombed out
in yet another hair brained psycho thriller. This was the same actress
(daughter/sister to the country duo, The Judds) who showed so much
poise and talent in such indie films as Ruby in Paradise
and Smoke. She did well to make Heat; and while
Kiss the Girls may have looked good on paper (starring
opposite Morgan Freeman is usually a sound bet), it was nothing
more than a cheap Silence of the Lambs knock off. She was
wise though not to sign on for the follow up, Along came a Spider;
she then went on to make several, equally tepid thrillers including
Eye of the Beholder, Double Jeopardy and High
Crimes. Each followed the same tired formula and had the same
ersatz texture to it (they’re almost indistinguishable from
one and other). And if Ms. Judd keeps it up, she’ll be in
danger of getting her own unflattering genre named after her. For
her next project, Judd places her poutty lips opposite Kevin Kline
in De-lovely, the bio-pic about American composer, Cole
Porter. It can’t possibly be another Judd-dud thriller, unless
Porter has some dark secrets in his closet that the world has yet
to learn. Speaking of fleshy lips and once promising careers, Angelina
Jolie just added the critically panned serial killer flick, Taking
Lives, to her portfolio to go with two plotless Tomb Raider
flubs.
A Little Help From Your Friends
After Kevin Smith's Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
received a tepid response and Ben Affleck nearly suffered career
decapitation for Gigli (his vanity love project with then
fiancée Jennifer Lopez), you’d think the only way for
the two to get back in the ballgame would be to do anything except
work together. But that's exactly what they did. The director-actor
duo found notoriety together with the bi-girl comedy romp, Chasing
Amy. Later, Affleck, along with Cambridge High sidekick, Matt
Damon, signed on for Smith's theologically irreverent Dogma
(I wonder if Mel’s ever seen it?), and now, after some
career turbulence, the two are rediscovering success together with
Jersey Girl. The film, about a widower reduced to a working-class
existence as he struggles to raise his daughter, may appear too
steeped in a manipulative mainstream formula for Smith’s fan
base (those who have hung tight with the self styled slacker since
he splashed onto the indie film scene with the crass cult hit, Clerks),
but Smith, peppers the script with enough quirky bites to appeal
to the usual suspects while freshening up the tried and-true arc.
Smith’s next project is the big screen blow up of The
Green Lantern comic book. At the moment the lead is uncast.
Alleck’s played a super hero before (Daredevil),
so I wonder…
--
Tom Meek
|