One
of the most interesting and pervasive trends in film and media has
been an increasing sense of paranoia, both blatant and implied,
in the messages communicated. The subtext of all this paranoia seems
to rise from an overarching sense of apocalypse on some level, be
that social, spiritual, environmental, or otherwise. In many ways,
this sense of paranoia seems to be manufactured in order to keep
media consumers in a heightened sense of anxiety and fear, because
fear is, as any psychologist will tell you, the greatest motivator.
In the case of media, that motivation is to watch, to be fascinated
by the images and messages provided so that you, the viewer, are
captured in the mental space of the media provider. The desired
result is, as I will propose here, a vote or a purchase, and the
more the better.
To
be sure, a paranoid populace is more likely to cede power to those
that can, in theory, remove their fear. If the government and corporate
powers can make you feel a very real sense of anxiety, it's much
easier to get you to get on board with a plethora of programs that
expand their power and reach, or to buy the product and/or service
that can (in theory) remove that fear and replace it with pleasure
or stimulation. And the greater the churn of that stimulation
the better: because it means you’re buying more, not less.
Often,
various paranoid media realities will play off one another, batting
you around like a ping pong ball. If network television news pummels
you with a sense of impending catastrophe, and you retreat to the
Cinemaplex, what you see there will likely give you ample reason
to feel more paranoid, not less. A common theme of horror and suspense
films is: “Trust no one!” Return from the theater to
the network primetime show, and you see more of the same: the crime
drama. While in the past you may have turned to prayer and meditation
for consolation against all these horrors, today you retreat to
the iPod, which is at least corporate owned and profitable. Alternatively,
you might actually embrace the paranoid and its stimulating media
rush, and you wind up more like Freddy Kruger and less like Friends.
Ultimately, we’re all addicted in one way or another, constantly
plugged into mediated realities which are controlled by promoters,
advertisers, politicians and others who want a vote or a purchase.
What
is missing is human interaction (don’t most people spend most
of their days in front of computer screens at work and at night,
at home, in front of the TV?). God forbid you should want any quiet
time on your own, or enjoy the normal pleasures of intimate human
intercourse (particularly sexual intercourse, vile and rife with
disease as that is). The fear of sex is used, strangely, to promote
more of it, but again, of the virtual and porn industry kind that
can be packaged and profited from. (As my mother once told me, sex
has always been around, it’s just that what people used to
do in private is now sold on eBay.)
If
you want to know how far we’ve ventured from what used to
considered normal human discourse, read Emerson’s Friendship.
You will note, if you’re honest, that you probably have no
friends based on Emerson’s definition, because everyone in
modern human society has become so commodified, demographied, slotted,
digitized and consumerized (including our families), that human
beings are becoming more like the Borg (of Star Trek) than
anything else. (If you doubt this, try to communicate with a very
focused computer gamer while they're in the zone.) Our purpose is
to buy and sell, and other humans are just means to an end, equivalent
to all the demonic forces in computer games you need to blast through
to win the prize. In this reality, real estate and things (real
or virtual) matter most, not people. Moreover, since most land has
been spoken for and resources are getting scarcer, the only places
ripe for economic expansion are either digital or, perversely, the
human body itself. Why else would Americans be getting so fat, with
fat oozing forth in places we never thought possible twenty years
ago? Today's economic empires are not built on colonial expansion,
but on the big bellies of couch potatoes, giving global expansion
an entirely new meaning.
Hyper-consumerism,
moreover, goes hand in hand with a paranoid media. Why? Because
hyper-consumerism is fueled by over stimulation, which is best accomplished
by shock and fear (or is it Shock and Awe?). Ask any behavioral
psychologist: play classical music and the mice in the maze will
go to sleep. Show them the CBS evening news and they will scurry
around, agitated and looking for their next meal. And that, my friends,
is the preferred behavior –- to have us scurry to that next
Happy Meal.
There
was a time when the European Enlightenment (and its Eastern counterpart
I would argue) offered us an alternative to our current form of
hyperstimulated media fascination. That alternative is not mystical
or obtuse: it's simply called self-aware mature adulthood,
and everybody from Hollywood to Bollywood seems intent on keeping
(mostly males) from achieving it. And what we have instead I will
call media fascism because fascism has, at its root, the term fascination;
in other words, fascination with power. For example, I was just
in London, and witnessed the changing of the guard. Swarms of eager
people crowded around to see behind the gates fascinated at the
event and the emblems of power: the pomp and circumstance of royalty
and its trappings. Just as we are fascinated by the Coat of Arms
of the Royal Family, so we are fascinated by the Fox News banner
and the unblinking eye contact of the news casters and the gowns
at the Golden Globes and the Super Bowl half time. We give the providers
of these experiences, in essence, our power and our responsibility:
that is the transaction. They fascinate us, we give them power.
Of
course the original model for all this fascination stuff is the
church. The church used to be the primary mediator between us and
God, taking away the painful responsibility of figuring out all
this life and death nonsense and giving us the program, which, if
adhered to, promised salvation. So it is today: but now the media
and film is the church and the mediated reality is not God, but
life itself, which is at its core (or so they tell us) a thing to
be feared and mistrusted. What used to be called the “will
of God” is now deemed “market forces" -- and God's
dark side, The Inquisition, has been replaced by The Apprentice
and Project Runway. The alternative offered to actual living,
painful and full of unpredictable outcomes, is the Mall, whose ultimate
expression is Disneyland. Shopping is the ritual that has replaced
churchgoing, the ritual that eases our pain by promising a buffered,
safe environment of eternal suburban abundance. Abundance being,
if you catch my drift, equated with heaven. Hell is, well, everything
threatening that: terrorists, criminals, corrupt politicians, accidents,
child molesters, calamities and, if you believe much of the media,
most other human beings (keeps us from unionizing, doesn’t
it?). Heaven is the Mall -- the Disney Experience -– which
gives us our myths and our purpose, but takes away our responsibility
for figuring life out on our own.
If
you doubt that normal human interchange is on the way out, just
watch the Disney Channel very carefully. You will note that all
of the teenage girls treat each other in in exactly the same way,
furrow their eyebrows in a consistent and petulant fashion, and
always have a little sound effect (like a cartoon) when they blink
or a “swoosh” when they move. In short, most are not
human beings, but witches or witches in progress. (Forget about
Princesses, that is so old school.) The Disney answer is
that we should all become like cartoons: that is, indestructible
(soon possible with genetics?). And our leaders form the perfect
example: Dick Cheney doesn’t die, he has “a routine”
heart episode which requires a quick fix and then, well, back up
on his feet like Goofy in some Disney cartoon. The problem is that
a lot of what Mr. Cheney promotes is not so funny.
Cartoon
reality is the alternative to the fear and hell that supposedly
exist everywhere else, and quickly becoming our idea of heaven.
To find hell we need not look beyond CNN’s The Situation
Room. The Situation Room mimics a war room like mentality
where there are multiple events occurring simultaneously in a crisis,
and you, the viewer, are the commander in chief that needs to be
kept abreast of all the incoming stimuli in order to make the best
decision. The urgency propagated by The Situation Room and
the 24 hour news cycle is keeps us, in essence, in continual and
anxious anticipation of the next event. The next event is, of course,
the disaster waiting to happen. The next tsunami, the next terrorist
attack, the next global epidemic, the next Katrina. Because if we
are given a heads up we might, in theory, survive. (Ironically,
many of these events are the result, directly or indirectly, of
human activity.)
We
might survive. If we stop and think about it a moment, the whole
proposition becomes a little absurd when in reality none of us survive.
We aren’t really cartoons; I mean, we all die, right? Or am
I missing something? Since we all die, then there must be another
motivating factor behind all this urgency. It must be, maybe, yes
I’ve got it -– we will survive longer than the next
guy. And it is surviving longer than the next guy that makes
us the winners in a game where we all lose. (Look at the first winner
of the Survivor show: he recently wound up arrested for
tax evasion).
Now
you might ask, who the hell cares? I guess I do, so I ponder it.
I ponder it because I am continually amazed at how manipulated people
are by other (I guess more intelligent?) people who will do anything
to optimize the system we have created that puts front and center
as its core reason for being one thing and one thing alone: profit.
That is, in essence, the value system that overrides all corporate
decision making. Profit. Now profit isn’t in itself “evil”--
but when devoid of complementary motives (like common decency) and
used as the fundamental driver of a society it can quickly skew
reality in very interesting and perverse ways.
One
of the more interesting reality alterations is that by commodifying
a sense of paranoid urgency the capitalist system has, in its very
real genius, figured out how to make money off our fear of death
and our longing for immortality. Because the fear of death (if one
looks at the philosophical underpinnings of such fear), the fear
of death invokes an urgency to live now and with a purpose; in other
words, to live with a sense of urgency means to live with a sense
that we can die at any moment, and therefore what counts is
the moment. Then, once this is understood, the question becomes:
what does one do with those moments in order to confront the continual
fear of death that stalks every human being on the planet? Ideally,
philosophers and spiritual teachers have us “live in the moment”
and experience heaven as life. (If you wonder what I’m
talking about, you might check out Terrence Mallick's The New
World.) Marketers have twisted this ideal (along with many
others) and channeled it to their own purposes. And it is here a
funny little thing called intention comes into play. And,
as Aristotle figured out a couple of thousand years ago, it is within
the world of intention that all ethics arise. The intended “purpose”
(according to Marketers) for our society is not that you should
meditate on the inevitability of death and seek some kind of individual
spiritual resolution or heightened poetic reverie; no, the intended
answer for our society is that you should numb yourself to the reality
of death through one of numerous distractions, hopefully several
at the same time, and all of which are designed to make somebody
some money.
However,
a society whose intentions are, at its core, to selfishly seek one’s
own profit over another is a society whose days, one would guess,
are numbered. This is the real apocalypse and the vicious cycle
that haunts our modern culture. We feel our days are numbered because
we innately know that the basis of our society is inherently corrupt
because the intentions at its core are misguided (unless you’re
a true believer, in which case the ultimate good for society is
profits). But the system, in its genius, turns that very sense of
apocalyptic urgency into fuel for more profit, as everyone seeks
to exploit one another and cash out on the sinking ship in ever
more blatant and creative methods (like unnecessary wars). It is
the cycle of our ever more cynical civilization: the sense of impending
doom that surrounds us as our Empire implodes based on its own internal
contradictions. In the case of the United States, social collapse
will not, I assure you, happen without somebody making a lot of
money. If you doubt me, just take a peek at Jim Cramer's cable show
Mad Money, as he cynically describes "government of
the corporations, for the corporations, and by the corporations"
even as he makes stock recommendations to investors.
So
are our days numbered? The real novelty our current system -- what
makes it different from, let's say, the Romans -- is to perennially
create a self-perpetuating social tension between our innate, internal,
human ethics and an external, dehumanizing and invasive values that
must seek, in some way, a release. And what if that release can
be controlled, that desire to escape from the binary conflict that
sees its manifestation in good vs. evil, heroes vs. terrorists,
Republicans vs. Democrats, Red States vs. Blue States, Pro-Life
vs. Abortion Rights, etc. etc., ad infinitum: in other
words, the perpetual struggle and conflict between opposites.
Our modern, technological twist is that all this struggle may
not create chaos and decline: no, the tensions created between this
struggle, exploited and amped up and in many ways created
by a lot of clever people who control and manage the media message
in highly Machiavellian ways –- the result is energies channeled
and released into hyper-consumerism. Yes, and then you’ve
got real profit. Mega profit. Really huge mega profit.
And we may not be doomed at all: we just might be at the beginning
of something really great!
Understand,
then, that our current method for social organization must create
ever more tension and ever more paranoid urgency and ever more fear
in order to create ever greater profits. Forget about peace. Peace
is patently useless and must be avoided. The War in Iraq aside,
even if in physical reality we have more peace (which is, in fact,
the case, if you check the statistics), in our mediated realities
we will have less and less as we move the reality of physical wars
and crime to the reality of commodified virtual war and crime (meaning
a computer games paradigm for living), of digitized and institutionalized
neurosis and mental dysfunction and paranoia –- a reality
that is perceived to be necessary for increased stimulation and
profits to create the churn necessary for hyper-consumer activity.
But
there is an alternative: that the tables will turn on the reality
manipulators in unforeseen ways in that individuals may seek release
not in the shopping mall and computer games, but in self-awareness.
And
there is a true urgency for such an awareness, because without it
we may truly destroy ourselves (i.e., the environment has no reset
button) -- no matter how clever our leaders think they are as they
play their games of social roulette. The urgency for awareness is
the urgency of the individual seeking personal and social peace
in a world which is determined in any way possible to remove that
peace because that peace is, paradoxically, an affront against its
(perceived) survival. You must be anxious, fearful, on edge and
ready to deploy. If you are not you will perish, or so they wish
you to believe.
But,
as stated before, we all perish anyway. The question comes back
to you, as an individual –- how do you perish, your way or
theirs?
--Don
Thompson (nextpixnyc@aol.com)
|