The
Dreamers
is Bernardo Bertolucci’s valentine to the ‘60s, a time
when both he and the world were young. The veteran Italian filmmaker
(Last Tango in Paris, Besieged) sets his story in Paris
in 1968, just before a series of protests and strikes that electrified
the world. Matthew (Michael Pitt), a visiting American student,
gets swept up into the heady currents of politics and art and sexual
freedom and narrates the story from a point not too far into his
future. An unabashed cinephile as well as language student, he religiously
attends the weekly museum screening of American and Nouvelle
Vague films and there meets fellow film lovers, Theo (Louis
Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). He and the brother and sister
become fast friends, in love with the beautiful films on the silver
screen and the intoxicating politics and protests outside. We get
to watch clips from some glorious films by Godard, Truffaut and
Fuller as we follow the three film buffs running around Paris re-enacting
scenes from their favorites. It must be said that in the ‘60s,
before videotapes and DVDs allowed unlimited access to film, before
the plethora of film schools and screenwriting classes, watching
classic cinema was indeed a shared communal ritual and rite of passage–
everyone of a certain age, for instance, can remember the first
time they sat in the dark auditorium at Whatever U. and saw Tod
Browning’s Freaks.
Unfortunately,
Bertolucci sees the era through a pair of rose-colored bifocals.
The photography, music and actors are all luscious; early scenes
of Paris, the film clips and the goofy ‘60s talk is delightful,
but Bertolucci suddenly switches gears from the political story
to the personal. Theo and Isabelle’s parents depart on a country
holiday and leave the kids alone in their apartment, with ample
supplies of food, a well-stocked wine cellar, and a couple of blank
checks. It’s party time, and the film stays inside for the
remainder of the film, perhaps because that’s the one place
Bertolucci can keep the characters almost continuously naked. He
drops hints at incest here and there, between Isabelle and her father,
between Isabelle and Theo, between Theo and Matthew –- no,
that wouldn’t be -– oh, it’s all quite dizzying
-- but the hints go nowhere and the sex becomes a finally wearying
gesture, the smirky equivalent of a French postcard. Were the students
just neurotic bystanders, or were they part of a generational sea
change? Bertolucci doesn’t tell us.
The
parents (finally!) come home to find their three charges fast asleep
in a wine and hash induced stupor, naked limbs twisted rapturously
around each other. Do they hit the ceiling and start yelling about
the mess and the missing money and get the story moving again? No,
they do not wish to wake the Sleeping Beauties and so tiptoe quietly
back to their holiday. Mon dieu, if only I knew of such
parents as these I would move in.
Ultimately,
Bertolucci only suggests psychosexual complexities because he cannot
or will not explain what this personal drama has to do with the
burgeoning political revolution outside, which would have been an
interesting albeit more difficult movie to make.
Finally, an
errant rock from the angry street below shatters the apartment window
and sails into their living room. Time to wake up. With only a few
minutes remaining, Matthew, Theo and Isabelle sober up, get dressed
and flee the apartment at last to join the grand march of history
outside, just beyond their limited vision.
--
Patricia Ducey
Copyright Web del Sol, 2004 |